Selected Models and Frameworks for EBP Implementation
- Evidence-based practice models and frameworks in the healthcare setting: a scoping review. (2023).This 2023 scoping review by Dusin, Melanson, and Mische-Lawson provides a useful summary of these and other selected EBP Models, organized by whether or how they integrate patient values (see Table 1, pp. 4-6).
This list is not intended to be exhaustive, nor does it always link to the initial publication of the model.
- Star Model (formerly ACE Star Model)Stevens, K. (2004).
- ARCC (Advancing Research and Clinical practice through close Collaboration)Melnyk, B.M. 29th International Nursing Research Congress: Innovative Global Nursing Practice and Education Through Research and Evidence-based Practice, July 19-23, 2018. Melbourne, Australia.
- CETEP (Clinical Excellence through Evidence-Based Practice)Collins, P.; Golembeski, S. Selgas, M.; Sparger, K.; Burke, N.; & Vaughn, B. (2007).
- JBI Model of Evidence-Based Healthcare(2005, 2016)
- Stetler ModelUpdating the Stetler Model of research utilization to facilitate evidence-based practice (2001).
This list is based on Jodi Jameson's EBP Implementation Models page.
AJN Series: Evidence-Based Practice: Step by Step
These persistent links allow Wright State University users to access these articles through our subscription to AJN. Note: If off campus, you will be prompted for your campus w number and password before being taken to the article.
This collection of articles was authored by faculty from the Arizona State University College of Nursing and Health Innovation's Center for the Advancement of Evidence-Based Practice and published in the American Journal of Nursing (AJN)
Duke Health EBP Tutorial
© 2019 Duke University and University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. This is an open-access publication distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike license
The Gap - In available evidence
- Framework for Determining Research Gaps During Systematic Review: EvaluationRobinson KA, Akinyede O, Dutta T, Sawin VI, Li T, Spencer MR, Turkelson CM, Weston C. Framework for Determining Research Gaps During Systematic Review: Evaluation. Methods Research Report. (Prepared by Johns Hopkins University Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-2007-10061-I.) AHRQ Publication No. 13-EHC019-EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Health care Research and Quality. February 2013. www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/reports/final.cfm.
The Gap - in translating available research into practice
- The current research to evidence-based practice time gap is now 15 Instead of 17 years: Urgent action is needed.Melnyk, B.M. (2021). The current research to evidence‐based practice time gap Is now 15 instead of 17 years: Urgent action is needed. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 18(6), 318–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12546
- Revisiting time to translation: implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs) in cancer control.Khan, S., Chambers, D., & Neta, G. (2021). Revisiting time to translation: implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs) in cancer control. Cancer Causes & Control : CCC, 32(3), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-020-01376-z
- The answer is 17 years, what is the question: Understanding time lags in translational researchMorris, Z. S., Wooding, S., & Grant, J. (2011). The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 104(12), 510–520. https://doi.org/10.1258/jrsm.2011.110180
- How long does biomedical research take? Studying the time taken between biomedical and health research and its translation into products, policy, and practiceHanney, S. R., Castle-Clarke, S., Grant, J., Guthrie, S., Henshall, C., Mestre-Ferrandiz, J., Pistollato, M., Pollitt, A., Sussex, J., & Wooding, S. (2015). How long does biomedical research take? Studying the time taken between biomedical and health research and its translation into products, policy, and practice. Health Research Policy & Systems, 13(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-13-1
